but due to how few EV battery fire are still somewhat rare, they get a lot of media timeFear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Often used by Big Oil and friends to discredit EVs, making people doubt their safety, usability, etc. There is sadly a lot of it about.
With change: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. I think we're moving to stage two.
Good one, needs to be called out for sure.There are short video clips of the car on fire, taken by people who were trying to help put it out, before the damn tank exploded and everyone ran for it. Not only has it been identified as a Land Rover Range Rover Sport, the number plate could be read, and someone looked up its MOT details online. It's a 2014 (I think) model and definitely a diesel.
Excellent, call him out & report himJust to add some context to this. The person who released the video is SerpentZA. He's a South African guy who has a real beef with China and pretty much anything to do with China. He lived there for some years before leaving. He's also claimed in one of his videos that China will switch all of our cars off remotely when they are ready to invade us so we can't go anywhere.
They are more expensive to repair but a lot of that is an insurance, repair and salvage industry geared up for ICE cars and with little or no experience of EVs. Most of the rest is parts availability problems.I have just read this an article in the Telegraph.
"Electric cars can be particularly expensive to repair, costing around a quarter more to fix on average than a petrol or diesel vehicle. Experts have previously warned electric vehicles are being written off after minor bumps because of the cost and complexity of fixing their batteries."
Absolutely, you know the saying don't let the truth get int he way of a good story.Re the Luton Airport fire, whilst some still say it was an EV or hybrid ( replying E10 EFL usually negates that ) the narrative amongst the EV naysayers is now that although it was a diesel that started it, the reason the fire spread around the car park was entirely ( or predominantly) due to nearby EVs subsequently catching on fire. They however have no evidence at all of what other vehicles were nearby. Responding to this by referring to the Liverpool airport fire a few years ago ( when there were significantly less EVs around) cuts no ice ( pardon the pun) with them.
Yes.Are you sure you meant to post that in this thread??
I spoke to a chap who is in car insurance and I said a little bump front or back won't affect the battery he said we have to allow for a whiplash affect on the battery. I think this is the insurance companies just trying to getmore money out of us all.They are more expensive to repair but a lot of that is an insurance, repair and salvage industry geared up for ICE cars and with little or no experience of EVs. Most of the rest is parts availability problems.
Small accidents won't affect the battery pack at all, they should be simple Cat N non-structural repairs, like they are for ICE cars. Cat S structural repairs it will depend what is damaged - but if the battery pack is fine, it should not be much different. Needing to replace the battery will be like needing a new engine for an ICE car.
Note that changes to how manufacturers are building cars (eg Tesla's megacastings, use of epoxy/glues and laminates) are making cars more expensive to repair generally.