Whilst this all sounds potentially good for any of us who need to use public chargers, I note that the argument says..
"The crux of the dispute was as to the interpretation of VATA 94 Sch 7A Group 1, which allows a supply of fuel/power to be reduced rate if made for a “qualifying use”. Note 3 states that qualifying use includes domestic use, which note 5(g) confirms includes a supply of electricity “to a person at any premises… not provided at a rate exceeding 1000 kilowatt hours a month”."
What seems to not be mentioned is how CMS Ltd. determine that the use of their chargers is wholly "domestic". Surely business users, especially, gig-economy workers, self-employed and small businesses will surely use the charging facilities too? At our local Fastned charging station there are regularly business vans using the facilities during the working week.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.