kiltox
Established Member
Continuous insurance enforcement - if a car is taxed it needs to be insured (more specifically, entered on the MID). SORN vehicles don’t.I can't see any reason to SORN a vehicle that costs £0 VED ?
Continuous insurance enforcement - if a car is taxed it needs to be insured (more specifically, entered on the MID). SORN vehicles don’t.I can't see any reason to SORN a vehicle that costs £0 VED ?
Personally I would keep it insured anyway for peace of mind, it can cost more to freeze or cancel insurance sometimes due to the charges the insurance companies add for changes. I suppose it's ok to not have it insured if you lock the car away in a secure garage or if you're not going to use it for a long time.Continuous insurance enforcement - if a car is taxed it needs to be insured (more specifically, entered on the MID). SORN vehicles don’t.
In fact, SAIC has many EV models, with different brands, incluing MG. Roewe, Buick, Chevrolet and Wuling, Baojun,Good reviews for ZS EV sales in several EV online sources and other EV analysts sources this month.
In percentage terms their performance is extraordinary. It is funny some link this with the effect Tesla is having on the car market rather than how good the ZS EV is. Any it is not clear why ZS EV is not enjoying same success in mainland Europe. May be there is a production/distribution lag so the European success may come later.
My worry is that with Covid still causing a big concern and Tesla over-manipulation of the car sales and motor industry/ financial markets we may have a sudden "Osborne Effect" in the whole sector as people keep their current car and wait for two or three years in the hope of buying a cheap high performance Tesla for same price or less what it cost to buy a ZS EV and investors invest in nothing unless it is somehow Tesla related.
If I where in a position to advice, I would suggest to SAIC to turn MG into fully EV company with only 5 or 6 models.
For example MG3EV, MG5EV, MGHEV MGZS EV, and MGX/E Motion.
They can then use the next 3 years to improve tech and lower cost. That will be the only way to keep up with Tesla.
Good reviews for ZS EV sales in several EV online sources and other EV analysts sources this month.
In percentage terms their performance is extraordinary. It is funny some link this with the effect Tesla is having on the car market rather than how good the ZS EV is. Any it is not clear why ZS EV is not enjoying same success in mainland Europe. May be there is a production/distribution lag so the European success may come later.
My worry is that with Covid still causing a big concern and Tesla over-manipulation of the car sales and motor industry/ financial markets we may have a sudden "Osborne Effect" in the whole sector as people keep their current car and wait for two or three years in the hope of buying a cheap high performance Tesla for same price or less what it cost to buy a ZS EV and investors invest in nothing unless it is somehow Tesla related.
If I where in a position to advice, I would suggest to SAIC to turn MG into fully EV company with only 5 or 6 models.
For example MG3EV, MG5EV, MGHEV MGZS EV, and MGX/E Motion.
They can then use the next 3 years to improve tech and lower cost. That will be the only way to keep up with Tesla.
Tesla are really in a different league to other manufacturers. Some, maybe myself, will shy away from their high tech infotainment systems and lack of shortcut buttons. If we want people to switch away from ICE cars they need to feel familiar in an EV.
If I where in a position to advice, I would suggest to SAIC to turn MG into fully EV company with only 5 or 6 models.
For example MG3EV, MG5EV, MGHEV MGZS EV, and MGX/E Motion.
They can then use the next 3 years to improve tech and lower cost. That will be the only way to keep up with Tesla.