
MG to launch first electric car with solid-state battery in 2025 | Autocar
MG parent SAIC accelerates cheaper, more energy-dense batteries and the first is due in a production EV next year
Yeah, exactly. Similarly, when the internet first started, people claimed we didn’t need it, it was slow, and no one would shop online. Today, they say EVs don't have enough range and that it will never improve. It's just absolute conservatism and the inability to see beyond the next paycheck.Electric cars will never catch on because er...mmmm.. Just because.
What’s a pay check??Yeah, exactly. Similarly, when the internet first started, people claimed we didn’t need it, it was slow, and no one would shop online. Today, they say EVs don't have enough range and that it will never improve. It's just absolute conservatism and the inability to see beyond the next paycheck.
Check you have been paid! Pay Cheque. It won't surprise me as in UK some companies make excuses for missing payments such as HR being on holiday or approver smoking outside at 4:50pm. You should always check. "Pay Check,"What’s a pay check??
Self employed - now retired. ?Check you have been paid! Pay Cheque. It won't surprise me as in UK some companies make excuses for missing payments such as HR being on holiday or approver smoking outside at 4:50pm. You should always check. "Pay Check,"
A guy told me the other day, that electric cars produce more particulates because they are heavier, and wear their tires and BRAKES out quicker. I'm afraid I almost exploded! But in the end just walked away.Electric cars will never catch on because er...mmmm.. Just because.
Yes, there is a level of misunderstanding that's hard for us EV drivers to contemplate! When I took delivery of my new ZS EV at the start of the year I had a steady stream of neighbours who were obviously very curious, coming over to tell me I'd regret getting an electric vehicle as they don't last because the battery is toast after 5-6 years & I won't be able to afford to replace it. The cars range is ridiculously short so I can't go anywhere. They still pollute with debris from tyres & brakes because the cars are so heavy, they damage the roads due to there weight...etc etc etc! And those are just the opening comments.A guy told me the other day, that electric cars produce more particulates because they are heavier, and wear their tires and BRAKES out quicker. I'm afraid I almost exploded! But in the end just walked away.
As your location is Oz, thought I would see what the average Ute weighs (unladen). MG4 starts around 1635kgA guy told me the other day, that electric cars produce more particulates because they are heavier, and wear their tires and BRAKES out quicker. I'm afraid I almost exploded! But in the end just walked away.
Interesting, but I think the ute is probably lighter than the sedan.As your location is Oz, thought I would see what the average Ute weighs (unladen). MG4 starts around 1635kg
View attachment 37888
Yes, but that's what Toyota are saying. This was announced around 9 months ago. From memory it was 1000 miles not kilometres. In reality Toyota will likely produce just one luxury ultra high range car with most of the new range of cars having 4-500 mile ranges. The charging networks are already looking at ultra ultra fast charges (1 mega watt) for the future because so many manufacturers will have very high range cars with fast charge capability. Although their cars will charge very fast I doubt they will achieve the manufacturers top speeds for charging. It's just the cars themselves will be capable of it.Data that information on the Toyota 1000 kilometre range car brings up some interesting questions.
If the car were to do that range it would have to have a battery of around 200 or 250 Kilowatt hour capacity.
To charge a battery of that size in 8 minutes would need a charger that would have to be capable of putting in 1.5 to 2 megawatt hours of charge.
Say the batteries were running at 1000 volts then the charger has to supply 1500 to 2000 amperes.
I would suggest that there would be very few chargers around that would be near enough to a high voltage powerline that could charge the car at that level.
Then of course how big does the charge cable have to be?
We will need superconductor cables to the car or no one will be able to lift the charge cable off the charger.
It all sounds great, but practicality of such a turn around time is going to be limited.
Especially in rural areas where the powerlines will not support Megawatt chargers.
Data that information on the Toyota 1000 kilometre range car brings up some interesting questions.
If the car were to do that range it would have to have a battery of around 200 or 250 Kilowatt hour capacity.
To charge a battery of that size in 8 minutes would need a charger that would have to be capable of putting in 1.5 to 2 megawatt hours of charge.
Say the batteries were running at 1000 volts then the charger has to supply 1500 to 2000 amperes.
I would suggest that there would be very few chargers around that would be near enough to a high voltage powerline that could charge the car at that level.
Then of course how big does the charge cable have to be?
We will need superconductor cables to the car or no one will be able to lift the charge cable off the charger.
It all sounds great, but practicality of such a turn around time is going to be limited.
Especially in rural areas where the powerlines will not support Megawatt chargers.
Yes, we do mix our measurements Pete. We still use miles per hour for speed & miles for distance. Yet most other measurements are metric!I thought that England used the metric system like Oz since the 1960s. It seems that you must use a mix of imperial and metric over there.
So a thousand mile range is going to need a 2 megawatt charger or there abouts.
They may be a rare find, as you say if most of the cars in the range do 4 to 500 miles then a 1 megawatt charger would probably do.
Still something will have to change as far as plugs, sockets and cables go.
You're forgetting that solid state batteries will have a higher energy density (kWh/kg) than current batteries.Not sure where you've plucked those figures from, but you're mixing up your kw with your kwh.
My MG5 battery is 60kwh and will go about 200 miles. Say a 1000km (about 620m) would need to be 200 kwh, you would need 200kwh of energy to charge it from zero to full. To charge in 8 minutes you'd need a 1.5mw charger (ignoring efficiency losses).
Current chargers go up tp 350kw so they'd need to be about 4 times as powerful - it doesn't sound that outrageous to me.
EDIT: with a 350kw charger, it would take about 20m to charge from 20 to 80%.