EV opposition in the media is ramping up

Who's going to know? He has a personalised number plate he swaps between cars.

It is about time the hosting companies took some responsibility. It is often claimed however that it would be an attack on free speech if offensive and damaging posts are edited off their platform.

I feel that if something causes harm or even leads to suicide that is not "free speech", it has cost the victim untold amounts, if the likes of Meta, X etc. have to double their monitoring staff so be it, they make enough money from the service.

This sounds good, but who decides what is causing harm? We are in a situation where a woman who declares that human beings cannot change sex is liable to be "cancelled" and lose her job. There is a pressure group that declares any speech they don't approve of to be "hate" speech "causing harm" and making them feel "unsafe". Specifically, that any reference to sex in mammals being immutable is responsible for not just suicides but murders. J K Rowling has been accused of killing people and even causing a murder for making just such a statement.

I don't want to start a derail on this, one of the reasons I come here is to get away from all the counter-factual nonsense going on elsewhere, but be careful what you wish for.
 
The FUDMaster is at it again 🙄 (I haven't watched it - just going by the title).


Shame on you for not watching it @siteguru, sloppy work! 😆

Essentially:
  • Man pays £120,000 for overpriced Porsche EV.
  • Man struggles with basic challenges like installing charging apps, planning routes.
  • Man decides he doesn't want Porsche EV any more and wants to end his finance agreement early.
  • Man discovers car is worth less than the outstanding finance (£44k value vs £64k).
  • Man declares car "worthless" and "disposable" and concludes EVs are doomed as "the batteries die".
  • Man wants to buy 911 despite the fact that he can't really afford it, bringing into question why he bought a £120k car in the first place.

It is a heartwarming story; to not have idiots like this competing with me when I next purchase an EV.

My recommendation would be for him to donate his body to form part of the aggregate for motorway resurfacing.

Something from a different perspective:
 
Because they know who HE is? ;)

I was presuming it would be sold through the trade somehow, and provided with a new (or its own original) reg number.

Too many non-EV drivers have a bucket of misconceptions, such as the one in this classic spoof:

That's hilarious!

I was actually mildly surprised when I realised that a car battery is indeed a pack of cells not unlike rather over-sized AA ones though! When I was at school the physics teacher used to get annoyed with us for calling one of these things a "battery", telling us that one was a cell, and that "battery" was the term for the set of cells that work together in an appliance. It's a battery of cells.

Seeing a demonstration of how an EV battery pack is made up of cells that look quite like the ubiquitous AA made me realise that engineers have been using Mrs Carswell's terminology all along.

Shame on you for not watching it @siteguru, sloppy work! 😆

Essentially:
  • Man pays £120,000 for overpriced Porsche EV.
  • Man struggles with basic challenges like installing charging apps, planning routes.
  • Man decides he doesn't want Porsche EV any more and wants to end his finance agreement early.
  • Man discovers car is worth less than the outstanding finance (£44k value vs £64k).
  • Man declares car "worthless" and "disposable" and concludes EVs are doomed as "the batteries die".
  • Man wants to buy 911 despite the fact that he can't really afford it, bringing into question why he bought a £120k car in the first place.

It is a heartwarming story; to not have idiots like this competing with me when I next purchase an EV.

My recommendation would be for him to donate his body to form part of the aggregate for motorway resurfacing.

Excellent précis.

The part he doesn't tell us of course is that the base price of the Taycan, new, was somewhere around £70,000 to £80,000, but he specced it up to £120,000 by adding every possible extra in the brochure. You don't get the cost of the extras back when you sell the car, though it might make it easier to sell.

Then of course the VAT is a complete write-off. So that's another £15,000 or so he'll never see again. That car was worth about £60,000 the minute he drove it out of the dealer's. That's where he should be basing his depreciation exercise. Doesn't look so bad now, does it?

Then again he explained the issue himself. Porsche have not only brought out a new facelifted Taycan with a longer range, even faster, and with even more amazing gizmos, they're over-stocked with the old model which is proving a bit difficult to sell as the guys who buy these things are really in the market for penis extensions and so want the latest model. It happens. It could happen to any model, including ICE cars.

The twist I'm interested in is that he actually likes the car a lot, has a home charger (and was talking about getting Intelligent Octopus when he moves house, not sure why he doesn't have it already) and I'm virtually certain that all this rubbish about going back to petrol is put on. I think he's either going to keep the Taycan when the lease period ends, or (more probably) change it for the facelifted model. I'll be interested to see how he explains that to his acolytes. I suspect that this charade, if it's more than just another pantomime-staged-for-clicks, is something to do with building a scenario where that happens.
 
This sounds good, but who decides what is causing harm? We are in a situation where a woman who declares that human beings cannot change sex is liable to be "cancelled" and lose her job. There is a pressure group that declares any speech they don't approve of to be "hate" speech "causing harm" and making them feel "unsafe". Specifically, that any reference to sex in mammals being immutable is responsible for not just suicides but murders. J K Rowling has been accused of killing people and even causing a murder for making just such a statement.

I don't want to start a derail on this, one of the reasons I come here is to get away from all the counter-factual nonsense going on elsewhere, but be careful what you wish for.
I do agree but what I have an issue with is the practice of Social Media companies of denying responsibility for what is posted on their sites. If somebody has a particular axe to grind find somewhere to express it other than the mainstream sites but at the same time Meta need to make sure material is suitable for their audience.

For example they need to look at age controls, it's no good claiming it's not their fault if they allow under age users. It is their problem to solve as they are the ones making profit from the users.

I don't like the way people are shouted down as soon as they express an opinion away from deemed acceptable by others, we are all entitled for our opinions even if could upset somebody.
 
You're right, of course, but the problem is with the implementation, which is done either by useless, arbitrary AIs, or by human beings with their own biases. For a time (and maybe still) Twitter would allow death threats and porn, but not the statement that a man is not a woman, because the people it employed as mods were AOK with death threats and porn but were pickled in the genderwoo.

I don't honestly know what the answer is, or even if there is one.
 
I think he's either going to keep the Taycan when the lease period ends, or (more probably) change it for the facelifted model. I'll be interested to see how he explains that to his acolytes. I suspect that this charade, if it's more than just another pantomime-staged-for-clicks, is something to do with building a scenario where that happens.
"I've already taken the depreciation hit on this EV and I can't afford to replace it, so I'll just have to live with it" ;)
 
Shame on you for not watching it @siteguru, sloppy work! 😆

Essentially:
  • Man pays £120,000 for overpriced Porsche EV.
  • Man struggles with basic challenges like installing charging apps, planning routes.
  • Man decides he doesn't want Porsche EV any more and wants to end his finance agreement early.
  • Man discovers car is worth less than the outstanding finance (£44k value vs £64k).
  • Man declares car "worthless" and "disposable" and concludes EVs are doomed as "the batteries die".
  • Man wants to buy 911 despite the fact that he can't really afford it, bringing into question why he bought a £120k car in the first place.

It is a heartwarming story; to not have idiots like this competing with me when I next purchase an EV.

My recommendation would be for him to donate his body to form part of the aggregate for motorway resurfacing.

Something from a different perspective:

Funny how some people are, just wannabe as for me I liked the MG4 real value so I bought one cash 💰 and very happy in fact only cost me $18 dollars in purchased electricity in 5500 km the rest came from my roof, wondering if he has a roof that provides free fuel.
 
"I've already taken the depreciation hit on this EV and I can't afford to replace it, so I'll just have to live with it" ;)

Yeah, I heard that. It seemed maybe just to refer to the next seven months, because his lease contract is up in October, and he certainly doesn't have to live with it after that if he doesn't want to. But I wonder if he's planting the idea that he won't be able to afford to change the car at all?

He does seem to change his car quite often though, and given that tasty facelift I'd have thought he'd have wanted a new Taycan. He's apparently had a string of different Porsches over the years so he isn't short of a bob or two, and given what that YouTube channel must be bringing in I'd have thought he'd have been salivating over the new model.

The real joke is that he drives really slowly! He seems to lose about an hour and a half on each of these day trips, that can't be explained by his charging shenanigans. Geoff said he was complaining (on the way to St David's) that people were flashing him from behind because they wanted to overtake. "Nobody was flashing me," said Geoff. Quite.
 
Last edited:
Funny how some people are, just wannabe as for me I liked the MG4 real value so I bought one cash 💰 and very happy in fact only cost me $18 dollars in purchased electricity in 5500 km the rest came from my roof, wondering if he has a roof that provides free fuel.

He doesn't seem to have solar, although I don't think there has been a shot of his roof. He doesn't even have a variable electricity tariff, no idea why not, but he said in one video that he was going to get one when he moved house. He does have a home charger though, so at worse he's charging for under 30p a unit most of the time, which isn't that bad.

He didn't have that home charger when he got the car, despite waiting eight months for it. Not very organised. Or keen. I think he really was a bit cross with public charging at that point, but it has all been an act for at least the past year, avoiding good new high-power installations and doing everything he can to slow the charging. He must know though that things have got enormously better over the year, and even though the price hasn't got better, nobody who drives a £120,000 car is worrying about whether the electricity is 65p or 85p a unit!
 
Yeah, I heard that. It seemed maybe just to refer to the next seven months, because his lease contract is up in October, and he certainly doesn't have to live with it after that if he doesn't want to.
Did he really say something like that? (I just made it up). 😂
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MG3 Hybrid+ & Cyberster Configurator News + hot topics from the MG EVs forums
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom