LenEV2016

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2024
Messages
1,858
Reaction score
3,814
Points
1,019
Location (town/city + country)
Scotland
Driving
Not an MG
VW group gearing up for their smaller EVs to be released next year.
Good for the market and choice.

Cupra Raval, VW ID Polo and small Skoda to join Renault 5, Nissan Micra and soon to be New Ford Fiesta.

Raval in particular is getting excellent pre launch reviews.
 
Last edited:
VW group hearing up for their smaller EVs to be released next year.
Good for the market and choice.

Cupra Raval, VW ID Polo and small Skoda to join Renault 5, Nissan Micra and soon to be New Ford Fiesta.

Raval in particular is getting excellent pre launch reviews.
We previously bought two Seat Ibizas and so if the Raval had been out several years ago there is a fair chance we would have got that instead of the MG4.

VW have been far too slow, but great that they are getting there.
 
We previously bought two Seat Ibizas and so if the Raval had been out several years ago there is a fair chance we would have got that instead of the MG4.

VW have been far too slow, but great that they are getting there.
I agree I read a review of a pre launch car and they said if they had built the Raval first there would be no need for the Born.
Seemingly the space inside is excellent for the size of the car (including the boot) and according to a couple of reviews I've read/watched (we all know these can be subjective) the brakes are amongst the best available on an EV, in terms of feel etc.

It also looks well specced with a great range for a smallish battery, 56kwh 280 mile range

1000028392.webp
 
Makes sense...
Smaller car = lighter and more aerodynamic = longer range.

56kWh is a sensible battery size. Enough to make a long journey viable but not carrying around excess weight all the time.

Maybe they were waiting for battery costs to come down enough that it wouldn't have to be pitched at a much higher price point than the equivalent ICE car 🤔
 
Makes sense...
Smaller car = lighter and more aerodynamic = longer range.

56kWh is a sensible battery size. Enough to make a long journey viable but not carrying around excess weight all the time.

Maybe they were waiting for battery costs to come down enough that it wouldn't have to be pitched at a much higher price point than the equivalent ICE car 🤔
They are making their own batteries now at Martorell in Spain, it's gearing up for 300000 units a year.
The fact they are making their own batteries will probably mean it qualifies for the full EV grant, like the Renault 5.
 
Yes the MG2, just hope they include a dual motor version to replace my xpower, which is bigger than I really wanted but forced to go larger to get AWD. I still love it to bits but a smaller version with similar BHP - now that would really be a thrill!
 
I think they have chosen the lighter better handling route like the alpine
Yes, they have shown there is much more to small hatch excitement than 0-60 speeds.

If one wants LOL factor, then ridiculous power in almost any car can give you that nowadays. But actual sustained fun is much more about agility, handling, flow and cornering abilities. After all, 0-60 (or 30-70) only lasts for a brief few seconds.

The absolute most fun car I've ever owned was my 1.8L normal aspirated Mk3.5 MX5. It's performance objectively was quite slow, but it was a car I could drive hard legally and the handling was brilliant fun: so light. In the end the extreme crampness and lack of seat comfort did for it, and it had to go, but I still miss it.
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MGS6 deep dive + MG2 rumours, MGS9 PHEV preview and Cyber X tease
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom