I find it amusing but not surprising that motoring journalists have decided that they will only be dragged kicking and screaming into the EV world. Starting the article with the negative comments about cars made in China set the tone, and shows how unbalanced the article is going to be. Due to the brainwashing of Motor Journalist that only a BMW is a drivers car, they instinctively feel that they have to find fault with any loaner that doesn't have the coveted BMW badge. I spent a lot of time in Germany from the sixties to the nineties and found the journos there much more balanced in their car test reporting and BMW was only regarded in the same category as Opel (Vauxhall over here), Ford, VW or Audi. BMW did a master PR job of convincing UK Motor Journos' that driving a BMW marked them out as a cut above the average driver.
If you set out to rubbish something it is easy to do. As a new owner of a Cyberster Trophy (and previous owner of 80 other cars), none were perfect, but none were as captivating to look at and satisfying to drive as the Cyberster. I would be more interested to hear what they had to say if they had spent their own money on it as we have.
Even so, clearly not done their homework, as the app does indeed let you precondition the cabin and put the electric seats on. Sure the Tesla App is probably the best out there, but the Tesla car has many faults/quirks which irritate the heck out of me, so I will forgive the Cyberster for its faults, most of which are related to the poorly implemented (not limited to MG) technology that NCAP are foisting on us all, as I enjoy the drive with the roof down, smiling as I hit the SuperSport button to sprint past slow moving traffic, and journos in their coveted loaner BMW's.