The cost saving I referred to is made because MG should just used the blade on the ZS EV.
Its a blade that they already are installing on another model, so no design / drawings / R&D required etc etc.
Plus they coukd have remaining stock of the blade from the ZS EV that they have not consumed ?.
Designing and producing a new smaller blade for the S5 does not make any sense ?.
It requires a new part number / cataloging, then stocking or ordering at every dealership, when the ZS EV blade will not only fit correctly, but it does a better job of clearing the rear window, due to its slightly increased blade sweep.
Why make a completely new smaller size blade for the S5 when the ZS EV blade is better ?.
Thanks for proving that the longer blade from the ZS EV is a compatible fit onto the S5.
I will be ordering one for our S5

.