Is helping to smooth electricity generation demands 'abusing' the system? One of the problems electricity generators have is the varying demand and inability for them to store the electricity.
There's enough Ccgt reserve to supply the entire UK grid and have immediate ROCOF (rate of change of frequency) response which Nuclear and other generator types don't, even battery storage has issues under a ROCOF situation with changing demand as the inverters are stepped where as a turbine can be spun up and down to within an accuracy of 1rpm to maintain voltage and frequency,
Ccgt can handle the UK power demand without any other generators being online, just they're not the flavour of the month since Putin's foray into the Ukraine, but we're viewed as the saviour of the world against coal stations.
Even if we went 100% renewable you'd still need something like nuclear to provide base frequency support, and a small number of fuel burning stations or hydro storage that can be controlled to a granular level.
The abuse is where buying it in at circa 12p on octopus Go and then selling it back to octopus at 15p
Addendum:
Localised domestic battery storage and generation helps very little to the network in terms of demand, however large sites such as those circa 250MW of battery storage that are going up will make a difference but how the 275/400kV supergrid is built it's a problem as it was built for a small number of large generation sites such as Drax, Ferry Bridge, Thorpe Marsh, Eggborough, Radcliffe, not lots of medium sized generators, which cause big fault level issues on the EHV network, which is why alot of generators can't connect now until 2030+ as NG is having to reinforce their network for something that it wasn't originally designed to handle.
But it's important to clarify the NG supergrid is capable of handling around 60GW+ of demand but it's how it's distributed that is the problem now and where the power is coming from.