GranTurismoEra
Established Member
In the UK there'll be cursing matches for those 5 minutes.But I suppose he'll only be hogging them for a few minutes.![]()
Last edited:
In the UK there'll be cursing matches for those 5 minutes.But I suppose he'll only be hogging them for a few minutes.![]()
Dave B. has asked exactly that question...Has anyone asked whether we actually want charging that fast ? This would actually slow down my stops as it would be so quick I'd have to wait with the car while it's charging and then move and park up to go and do the other stuff I stopped for.![]()
Depends on the voltage, I've not seen any mention of what voltage their mega chargers are running at.Check the cable thickness, can that really deliver 1000kWs?
1,000-volt architecture apparently.Depends on the voltage, I've not seen any mention of what voltage their mega chargers are running at.
That's still 1,000 amps, a lot of current through that cable.1,000-volt architecture apparently.
That's what RMS is all about: making AC the same as DC from the point of view of heating etc.Not sure there's much difference in a non inductive load, especially if you talk in RMS values.
The calculations are based on continuous loads. Fuses, breakers, and the cables they protect can take considerable overloads for considerable periods of time, like the time it takes to have a shower. In the end, someone must have taken a longer shower than usual, or not enough time between showers, so that the hot cables could not recover.So could there be an element of overload built in to the cable calcs?
I meant it in relation to BYD's calcs, not the shower circuit.So could there be an element of overload built in to the cable calcs?