Is Sodium Ion about to hit mainstream

T1 Terry

Prominent Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
1,979
Reaction score
3,373
Points
929
Age
70
Location (town/city + country)
Mannum South Australia
Driving
MG4 (2022-2025)
CATL recently announced their first supplies of Na+ (Sodium Ion) batteries for next mth. That belief that it was yrs away before they reached anything that was comparable to LFP may have just been shattered.


My question is, would you choose an EV with comparable range that used Na+ cells, or stick with NMC or LFP chemistry batteries?

T1 Terry
 
I wouldn't move to the technology just for the sake of it but it will likely become common in time.
What we have at the moment isn't broken so I'm in no rush to fix it.
It is broken, The two choices at the moment are:
Ternary chemistry cells like NMC (Nickel Cobalt Manganese) and NCA (Nickel Cobalt Aluminium) don't function all that well in the cold, -20°C will result in a 60% to 80% capacity loss .... this becomes more apparent as the cycle life increases resulting in serious loss of range in the cold as the vehicle battery ages ... rapid charging ages them much faster than home charging.
They also do not meet the Chinese thermal runaway criteria and will be banned from use in new Chinese cars sold to the local market.

LFP will work discharging down to -20°C, but they should not be recharged at anything below 0°C or risk both capacity loss and not achieving a full recharge.
They are far better at thermal stability and don't suffer thermal runaway to the point that they pass the Chinese criteria for the domestic vehicle EV market.

Where the temps drop below -20°C, Sodium ion is the better chemistry, have the least capacity loss and have by far, the longest cycle life. They do not suffer thermal runaway and pass the 120km/h barrier crash test, Ternary cells most definitely won't and I don't believe LFP have been tested to this sort of collision impact to find out just what would happen ....

T1 Terry

What is their power to weight ratio and longevity?
Power to weight is equal to the commonly used LFP chemistry, 175Wh/kg and a much longer cycle life, particularly if fast charged. They do not require special battery heating in the cold, down to -40°C ..... which I just learnt, is the same as -40°F .... who knew (well, probably lots of people).
The other promising thing is they are very young in the development time span, so things can only improve as time goes by .......

T1 Terry
 
You're making it all sound very rosy. But what about maximum charge rate of SIBs compared to NMC?
 
You're making it all sound very rosy. But what about maximum charge rate of SIBs compared to NMC?
The CATL Na+ will charge at 5C without a problem, all day every day, NCA at around 2C to 80% but degrade due to heat generation internally over time, NMC at 1C to 1.5C to 80%, but again, continual fast charging will shorten cycle life.

Good quality LFP, 3C to 5C, but 1C can be pumped in to around 95% SOC .....

C rating is the parallel cell capacity, so a 100Ah Na+ cell, can be charged at 500 amps till the voltage reaches 4.3v, close to 95%, then slowed down to stop the cell going over the 4.3v, probably around 15 mins to fully saturation charged, but 10 mins or less, depending how deeply discharged the cell was, will reach around 95% SOC

Do not try this at home with any of the other three chemical lithium batteries, 4vdc max for LFP but drop down to 3.65v for the constant voltage stage to get the cell up to saturation charged 100% capacity

Let me know if you attempt that sort of charging with NMC or NCA cells, I wanna watch from a safe distance, so please set up a camera so I can watch it from my laptop ;) :LOL:

T1 Terry
 
CATL recently announced their first supplies of Na+ (Sodium Ion) batteries for next mth. That belief that it was yrs away before they reached anything that was comparable to LFP may have just been shattered.


My question is, would you choose an EV with comparable range that used Na+ cells, or stick with NMC or LFP chemistry batteries?

If it is better or the same in every way as LFP (and better in all but weight over NMC) I would go for sodium.
  • Better cold weather performance
  • Better for the environment
  • Longer lasting
  • Cheaper (presumably)
But will it achieve all those things? Let's hope so!
 
If it is better or the same in every way as LFP (and better in all but weight over NMC) I would go for sodium.
  • Better cold weather performance
  • Better for the environment
  • Longer lasting
  • Cheaper (presumably)
But will it achieve all those things? Let's hope so!
I think the recent drop in Lithium prices killed the 'cheaper' advantage causing some companies to either quit or put on hold their development. source Matt Farrell - Undecided.
 
LFP will work discharging down to -20°C, but they should not be recharged at anything below 0°C or risk both capacity loss and not achieving a full recharge.

That would be 0°C battery temperature rather than 0°C ambient temperature, though, and you can always run a battery heating cycle.
 
That would be 0°C battery temperature rather than 0°C ambient temperature, though, and you can always run a battery heating cycle.
Absolutely, but that is using up some power that wouldn't be necessary for the sodium chemistry, meaning that there will be much less of an efficiency drop in winter.
 
Everything is developing so quickly, all we can do is buy the best thing for our needs at the time we need/want it, and relax until we're at the stage of needing/wanting something else.
 
Everything is developing so quickly, all we can do is buy the best thing for our needs at the time we need/want it, and relax until we're at the stage of needing/wanting something else.
Exactly. The main thing is that the car will continue to work.

That means it needs to charge and the charging ports seems to be pretty well defined by now.

And even then people with Chademo connectors can get adapters so that they can charge with CCS.
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MG4 EV Refresh + NEW MG4 EV Urban - UK arrival dates, prices, specs (2026)
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom