I'll just point out that other EVs use regen for adaptive cruise control, even MG's own MG5. So I don't think that this feature is missing because of any mechanical constraint.
Unless the ZS EV and the MG4 uses the same motor and gearbox, there could be a difference in what these components can handle.
I once owned a car that had a diesel, that came in 100, 120 and 150 hp variants.
The 100 and 120 hp variants rarely saw any problems with the gearbox, but the 150 hp variant had just enough torque to overpower the gearbox.
This meant that most 150 owners experienced problems with their gearbox, needing to have bearings changed, while the 100 and 120 owners rarely or at a lot longer intervals, needed this.
So if the gearbox in the ZS EV is weaker than the one in the ZS EV, it might not be able to take the load of repeated max regen braking, as opposed to using the friction brakes for this task, most of the time.
Not saying this IS the case, i am just saying that there is a posibility that something like this could be the cause.
I don't follow the logic here, what is the difference between driving the car with this hack and not using ACC. Every time you lift off the accelerator to slow back to the speed limit the regen will activate. The system should be designed assuming that the driver never uses ACC, as several people on here do.
The thing is.
MG did not include this for a reason.
Maybe it cost money, and they did not want to spend that money.
Maybe there is some mechanical reason.
Maybe they decided they added "enough" features to the gen 2 car, and wanted to "save" something for when they release Gen 3.
Or maybe it is something completely different.
But since we do not know, we can not make a reasonable deduction on, whether it is "ok" or "not ok" that they did not.
They omitted anti pinch in 3 of the electric windows, this is maybe a saving of £1 per door, and they omitted one single valve, costing maybe £10 that would have made the climate control, able to do cabin heating (Heat pump), so it's not like they don't penny pinch to the max, so maybe they saved £2 per unit of the bosch system, because they omitted the regen working with ACC, and decided this was worth it.
Or maybe they decided that heatpump and braking on ACC is the selling point on the gen 3...
In reality we will probably never know, but if this IS just them being lazy or cheap, it is a piss poor decision on their part
That's not with ACC, that's normal driving and lifting off the pedal to stop the car. It's done to show how quickly you can stop the car. In normal driving you would lift your foot slowly and the regen wouldn't activate as strongly. This is the benefit of one pedal driving and probably the only feature I will miss moving from the Leaf to the MG.
Would have been nice to see this hack on the gen 2, and see if the regen percentage went about ~20% as the normal regen does max.