Where have you read this, all I've seen is a government denial. Doing a search anything that suggests a tax is dated way earlier this month when first reported by the Telegraph.
I saw this Auto Express article first (dated yesterday), which doesn't mention the recent Heidi Alexander comments from the previous day, so I searched further and found this article (dated yesterday), and this from the Mirror, both saying that Heidi Alexander "misspoke" about ruling out a national pay-per-mile scheme.
 
S'pose we'll find out on Wednesday. :unsure:
They have started up spitting image again, they have it on YouTube and twitter and it send our politicians up brilliantly, also a certain individual from across the pond.
There recent stuff about the now Mr Andrew Windsor is very good 👍
 
Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, has ruled out a pay-per-mile scheme for the UK. Looks like the anti-ev press have jumped on a rumour and run with it. Mind you its taken the government long enough to either confirm or deny it.
I'd urge caution. The statement she made was "There are no proposals to introduce a national pay-per-mile scheme. This Government are firmly on the side of drivers. As I have set out, we are pumping £24 billion of capital into motorways and local roads, with a record £1.6 billion for local roads maintenance this year, which is £500 million more than last year, and we are further repairing rundown bridges, decaying flyovers and worn-out tunnels."

Her statement is true. There are no [published] proposals on a national PPM scheme. It doesn't mean there won't be, either in this budget or the next... nor that they are not (re-)examining the possibility. It just needs to be equitable and apply to all vehicles.

The original report in The Telegraph (5 Nov) also claimed "government officials have denied these plans", stating "a Transport Secretary has explicitly stated that a national pay-per-mile scheme is not being proposed". So what Ms Alexander said in reply to questions on Thursday hasn't changed anything in the original Telegraph report. So there's been no change since the original article was published.

It has the hallmarks of two things: right-wing press/oil lobby anti-EV troublemaking and/or an intended government leak designed to gauge the feelings about PPM. I suspect both.

On the right-wing press anti-EV troublemaking front, The Telegraph has again this morning negatively slanted an article about infotainment screen advertising/notifications in EVs, as if infotainment systems in ICEs are not capable of the same/similar things! For example, whereas an EV's infotainment system monitors HV battery level it is easy to monitor ICE fuel level sensor output and travel time (and is done), so advertisers will want a bit of that action too I would think, especially as the ICE market will be in the majority well into the late 2030s.

The anti-EV reporting in the UK right-wing press is well noted and has all the hallmarks of cherry-picking/misinformation campaigns practiced by lobbyists and apologists for the asbestos industry, tobacco industry, and oil industry over the last 80 years or so.
 
Confirmed in the budget: 3p/mile charge for EVs from 2028, 1.5p/mile for plug-in hybrids.

Fuel duty frozen until September 2026, will rise in stages after that.
This doesn't bother me personally. As a predominantly home charger on a 6p tariff, the mileage cost still makes EV motoring far cheaper than an ICE car.

However, the perception of EVs as a rule (only 25% of new cars this year were EVs), will be hampered by this announcement.

I do think it's fair for EV drivers to pay something, but there had to be a better way to do that so as not to risk hammering an emerging, and necessary, EV market.
 
This doesn't bother me personally. As a predominantly home charger on a 6p tariff, the mileage cost still makes EV motoring far cheaper than an ICE car.

However, the perception of EVs as a rule (only 25% of new cars this year were EVs), will be hampered by this announcement.

I do think it's fair for EV drivers to pay something, but there had to be a better way to do that so as not to risk hammering an emerging, and necessary, EV market.
.
Still gonna cost you more, which ever way you look at it. Another little kick in the knackers for EV drivers. 🙄🙁
Still s'pose ICE driver's will be celebrating. 🙄🤪
 
It is a bit odd if you are trying to raise the share of new cars that are EVs:
  • Introduce a new subsidy scheme for £3,500/£1,750.
  • Start charging EV owners £195/yr VED.
  • Start charging EV owners 3p/mile.
  • Leave public charging at 20% VAT.
  • Raise luxury EV threshold to £50k.

Seems like a mixed message.
 
Last edited:
No details on that yet, it sounds exactly the same as trailed: you will estimate your annual mileage and pay up front when you pay your VED as an extra charge, with an adjustment if you predict it wrongly at the next year.

I don't think there will be any allowance for driving abroad, but we will see.

So instead of the £0 I paid last year, I will be paying £525 VED once this kicks in during 2028! (£195 + 11,000 miles at 3p/mile).

Maybe I should go back to ICE?
 
I recently inherited my dad's 2014 diesel Golf, only done 64,000 miles.

Had planned to swap it for an EV to become a 2 EV household, but it is only £35/yr VED and does 50mpg... and is cheap to insure.... and parts are cheap as chips.

So am thinking about just keeping it. I don't want to face up to £1000/yr VED every March with 2 EVs.
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MGS6 deep dive + MG2 rumours, MGS9 PHEV preview and Cyber X tease
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom