Whereas many years ago 30 MPG was common for many ICE cars , and through regulations and public pressure many cars now do 45-60 MPG if the manufacturers figures are to be believed . If the average driver is only doing the same yearly mileage then there must be a reduced tax revenue there which could be addressed by , oh ! lets see a PPM tax on ICE vehicles to make up the shortfall, from what they normally would have contributed. After all fairs fair.
That would stop the mass migration back to ICE cars if some of the social media reports are correct and the governments mandate of EV adoption can get back on track. I put it to the house! :LOL:
 
Whereas many years ago 30 MPG was common for many ICE cars , and through regulations and public pressure many cars now do 45-60 MPG if the manufacturers figures are to be believed . If the average driver is only doing the same yearly mileage then there must be a reduced tax revenue there which could be addressed by , oh ! lets see a PPM tax on ICE vehicles to make up the shortfall, from what they normally would have contributed. After all fairs fair.
That would stop the mass migration back to ICE cars if some of the social media reports are correct and the governments mandate of EV adoption can get back on track. I put it to the house! :LOL:

Never thought of it that way, good point.
🙂👍
 
If the validation for the EV tax is sharing the cost for road repairs and upgrades, request the figures for the fuel tax collected and the monies allocated for road works ........
When the two figures aren't even close, suggest a reduction in politician pay-pack and perks to reduce the need for additional tax going into general revenue .... or a 10% reduction in the number of paid politicians to give relief on the fuel tax and introduce a PPM across all vehicles and that money goes in an account that is only used for road maintenance ....... it won't get anywhere, but it might shift some of the ICE drivers opinions more toward the EV drivers and put a scare through the pollies for Christmas ....

T1 Terry
 
Back to travelling abroad. As the vehicle has to travel through customs, and as your details are already logged when you enter and leave anyway, they could take a note of the mileage as you leave and return.
That's a good point.

But then customs people have to talk to the DVLA and be trusted by them and have working IT systems connected to either other.... that's usually where cross-government programmes go wrong.

I am sure they could simply pay one of the big outsourcing companies £4bn to produce a barely working system in 5 years time...? 😉
 
...
I probably threw too many figures out there earlier, but I’m loosely making the same point in reverse: UK-wide, roughly 80% of EV owners can charge at home, but in London it’s closer to 30% because so many households don’t have off-street parking.
...
...
Although surveys do suggest that 85% of people with EVs in the UK have access to off street charging, so I am not sure about some of your numbers.
...
I think the point to be taken from this is that it is primarily people with access to off street charging that are buying/running EVs.
A PPP charge on top of public charging costs removes all economic incentives to switch to an EV if you haven't got access to off street charging.
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MGS6 deep dive + MG2 rumours, MGS9 PHEV preview and Cyber X tease
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom