Next Car?

I didn't realise these suggestions were in response to my post!

So the confusion led to suggestions how to improve our efficiency and I thank those for their suggestions.

Mrs S uses ACC most of the time.
We have an efficiency of 2.2 miles/kWh.
Would it be better without it, or not?
 
Last edited:
I didn't realise these suggestions were in response to my post!
Well that's a point, my assumption because they appeared straight after your post, was that they were in answer to you could be wrong, maybe they were answering an earlier question somewhere.
In which case I apologise to them for attributing confusion to them.

Mrs S uses ACC most of the time.
We have an efficiency of 2.2.
Would it be better without it, or not?
It's only theory on my part, but for me it's the classic answer,
"How long is a piece of string"
Depends on driving conditions, also depends how she drives without it.
But it's likely to be better without it.
 
My wife would be far worse than the ACC, she will jump on the brakes at the last second, plant the foot as soon as there is a space big enough for postage stamp .... so the ACC saves both the battery capacity and cleaning costs from the upholstery and my clothes .....
I can't wait until she is at the age where she has to do the compulsory driving test, I doubt the testing officer will let her continue driving them around long enough to get back to the office, I expect they will jump out at the first possible chance :LOL:

T1 Terry
 
No idea where the last reply went .....
It might be like that in WA ... but in NSW they are ruthless, tougher than the first driving test to get a licence because they expect you to have learnt a lot more during your yrs of driving

If you have a high grade licence, such as a medium rigid to drive a motorhome, they send you a letter before hand, this is from our RV forum

I went to Service NSW yesterday regarding my old fart's driving test and was told that, despite my cardiologist advising that no more visits to him are required, I still have to see him for a test. Also, a referral from GP is required.

I don't give this particular person much of a chance in passing his test, I'm not sure how he got the licence in the first place to be honest ..... and instant fail to change back gears as you slow for an intersection or approach a set of traffic lights with other vehicle already stopped or a red light ....... Their logic, if you miss the gear, you now have only a single means of slowing the vehicle to a safer speed, if you stop on the brakes only, you show you approached the traffic situation safely and at a speed you could avoid a serious accident if there was a brake failure ........
Basically, you should be approaching the situation in a gear sufficiently low to come to a near stop without using the brakes ...
If you apply the clutch or select neutral before the vehicle is at the point the engine is fighting the brakes, instant failure .....
If you do the test in an automatic truck, you licence is marked as auto transmission only ....
Most fail the double clutch back to first at the crest of the big hill or failing to select the appropriate gear before attempting to descend the hill, the last one applies to automatics as well, even with a car licence .....

T1 Terry
 
I don't have personal experience yet, but the number of ancient bad drivers on the road indicates out test isn't that severe. There's instances, of " if you only drive short distances close to home. you'll be OK" Aren't a lot of prangs close to home??? Perhaps that's why.
 
No idea where the last reply went .....
It might be like that in WA ... but in NSW they are ruthless, tougher than the first driving test to get a licence because they expect you to have learnt a lot more during your yrs of driving

If you have a high grade licence, such as a medium rigid to drive a motorhome, they send you a letter before hand, this is from our RV forum

I went to Service NSW yesterday regarding my old fart's driving test and was told that, despite my cardiologist advising that no more visits to him are required, I still have to see him for a test. Also, a referral from GP is required.

I don't give this particular person much of a chance in passing his test, I'm not sure how he got the licence in the first place to be honest ..... and instant fail to change back gears as you slow for an intersection or approach a set of traffic lights with other vehicle already stopped or a red light ....... Their logic, if you miss the gear, you now have only a single means of slowing the vehicle to a safer speed, if you stop on the brakes only, you show you approached the traffic situation safely and at a speed you could avoid a serious accident if there was a brake failure ........
Basically, you should be approaching the situation in a gear sufficiently low to come to a near stop without using the brakes ...
If you apply the clutch or select neutral before the vehicle is at the point the engine is fighting the brakes, instant failure .....
If you do the test in an automatic truck, you licence is marked as auto transmission only ....
Most fail the double clutch back to first at the crest of the big hill or failing to select the appropriate gear before attempting to descend the hill, the last one applies to automatics as well, even with a car licence .....

T1 Terry
License? What’s that?
 
I didn't realise these suggestions were in response to my post!

So the confusion led to suggestions how to improve our efficiency and I thank those for their suggestions.

Mrs S uses ACC most of the time.
We have an efficiency of 2.2 miles/kWh.
Would it be better without it, or not?
If she does a 200 mile journey with the AC on and you're paying 7p/kWh it's going to cost £6.36 and will arrive in a good mood because she's warm and the windows didn't steam up.

If she does the same journey with the AC off and gets 3 miles/kWh it'll cost £4.67 but she'll be grumpy and cold with steamed up windows.

The question you've got to ask yourself is, is it worth £1.36 to have a happy Mrs. S?
 
Last edited:
If she does a 200 mile journey with the AC on and you're paying 7p/kWh it's going to cost £6.36 and will arrive in a good mood because she's warm and the windows didn't steam up.

Are you confused again?
securespark was talking about ACC, Adaptive Cruise Control, not Air Con
 
Are you confused again?
securespark was talking about ACC, Adaptive Cruise Control, not Air Con
Leave me alone. Too many acronyms. I'm having a senior moment/week/month/year 🥴

You must be after @siteguru's chief pedants position 🤣

And anyway @T1 Terry didn't realise either as he gave me a fist bump so there are at least two of us who are confused.
 
Did I say I wasn't confused???
Couldn't figure out how to add up 9, $2 coins the other day, had a feeling it wasn't $1.80 but $18.00 just seemed too high, had to ask my wife, and between us we figured it out.

This getting old lark is not what it's cracked up to be.
And I think T1 is just after the score
 
If she does a 200 mile journey with the AC on and you're paying 7p/kWh it's going to cost £6.36 and will arrive in a good mood because she's warm and the windows didn't steam up.

If she does the same journey with the AC off and gets 3 miles/kWh it'll cost £4.67 but she'll be grumpy and cold with steamed up windows.

The question you've got to ask yourself is, is it worth £1.36 to have a happy Mrs. S?
Flowers and chocolates my friend, flowers and chocolates, that’s all I’m saying 😉
 
Leave me alone. Too many acronyms. I'm having a senior moment/week/month/year 🥴

You must be after @siteguru's chief pedants position 🤣

And anyway @T1 Terry didn't realise either as he gave me a fist bump so there are at least two of us who are confused.
I just thought it was funny as, yes, it makes sense to have a happy Mrs S!

Aren't a lot of prangs close to home??? Perhaps that's why.
I remember seeing something on TV in the 1970s before the introduction of compulsory front seatbelt wearing where they were talking to drivers asking why they weren't wearing their seatbelt. The drivers all but one said they didn't bother because it was only a short local journey but they would wear it for a longer one.
The "but one" never wore a belt.

But accidents are more likely to happen closer to home as the driver feels familiar with the territory and lets their guard down.

When the UK front seatbelt law came in on 31 January 1983, usage jumped from 30% to 90% overnight.

Victoria made seatbelt wearing mandatory in 1970 and by 1972 all other states had followed, so we were more than a decade behind Oz.


LMA. TMA. IHASM.
Fixed that for you!
 
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MG4 EV Refresh + NEW MG4 EV Urban - UK arrival dates, prices, specs (2026)
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom