Alb
Moderator
- Joined
- May 11, 2021
- Messages
- 4,885
- Solutions
- 7
- Reaction score
- 6,398
- Points
- 1,988
Total coincidence they have identical GOM range? 

I know. I really should work something out with that and the SOCTotal coincidence they have identical GOM range?![]()
One SR and one LRand very different SOC, but sameish economy.
No need, a detour to extend the journey will have the same effect on efficiency and the added benefit that you can listen to your favourite music/podcast for a bit longer…I need help guys and gals, do i need to take my wife with me to work to get better efficiency?![]()
Great post, and utterly honest, too. Charging losses can be up to 20% but often ignored by EV owners. Our MG4 Trophy LR and the new MG4 Trophy Extended Range do seem to be somewhat optimistic on the miles/kWh. With the former I tend to use slightly less than 3-miles/% and with the Extended Range about 3.4miles/%. The Extended Range seems far more efficient the the LR and I find it nicer to drive.I find the reported miles per kWh figure to be pretty inaccurate in comparison to the percentage drop of the battery. Either my battery capacity is bigger than advertised or the consumption figure is pessimistic.
By recording the energy used for charging I'm able to calculate the real miles per kWh. Over 14k miles that's pretty much 3.5 before considering any charging losses. I'm averaging near enough 200 miles per 100% battery consumption which, in my MG5 SR, equates to 4.1 miles per kWh.
17% loss seems reasonable when considering the high proportion of slow solar charging I do and heat lost with cell balancing. Some is also used by running the heating while charging at times - and perhaps this accounts for some of the anomaly.
So, like the GOM, I also ignore the consumption figure.