Wow, he really does know his stuff!
Yeah, he's the real deal. And I realise I was wrong about something. I had read that the reason batteries shouldn't be left at 100% was that all the lithium ions were crammed into the cathode, and the physical space they occupied was bad for the battery. Now if that was true, then it would surely follow, or so I thought, that the LFP would also be susceptible to the same problem, even if it was to a lesser extent. So that gave credence to the guys who were stroking their chins and saying, well now, you people with LFPs, don't get complacent, you should be following the same routine. (Even though MG don't just specifically
tell you not to do that, they've jemmied the app so you
can't do that even if you've fallen for this schtick and want to.)
Indeed, we had a new member come on here with a second-hand SR which was reporting some odd range anomalies, and he was worried about the health of the battery. The car was only a year old, I don't know what you can do to a battery in only a year to damage it. But anyway, someone immediatly piled in telling him that probably it had been charged up to 100% too much and that had damaged it. Because that's what NMC owners are always being guilt-tripped about. But even in an NMC, you'd practically have had to leave it at 100% for the entire year to do any measurable harm. The car had done 8000 miles, so that probably hadn't happened.
As we discussed the issue, it became fairly clear that the opposite was almost certainly the case. The battery hadn't been charged up to 100% nearly enough. Either the previous owner had believed the 80% mantra and taken the trouble to stop the charge most of the time, or he'd been using rapid chargers a lot, maybe not having home charging. The battery was taken to 100% and balanced a few times and everything started to look fine. (The member rejected the car anyway because of other problems, and was offered a different one.)
But anyway, that's not what causes the degradation at all. It's not the ions cramming into the cathode, it's the high potential reached at high charge that causes the
electrolyte to degrade. A completely different process. Now, look at 4 min 18 sec on that video. LFP has a very different chemistry which doesn't reach such a high potential, and so the electrolyte doesn't degrade. So what the hell, as he says, whack the LFP up to 100% whenever you choose.
He also seemed to say that the problem of "shallow cycles" which he said wrecked some Leaf batteries, doesn't apply to the LFP. People would buy a Leaf (NMC) and just go down the shops then come home and plug the car in and charge it again, so it was spending almost all its life at close to maximum charge. (They should really have been doing several supermarket or school runs between charges, and only charging to 80% most of the time, but it's human nature to want to keep the tank full, isn't it?) He implied that the LFP wouldn't mind if you did that - he interrupted his description of the problem to state that he was just talking about NMC.
So with the SR we have a smaller range, and slower maximum charge speed on rapid chargers (88 Kw as opposed to 140 Kw for the LR battery), but we do have an easier battery to manage, and we really can keep it fully charged ready to go all the time if that's what we want to do.
I still do up to a week's worth of driving on one charge and then think, well I'm under 40%, probably ought to charge, because I've internalised all the mantras about NMC battery care too much, but the message seems to be, if you want to bring the car home and plug it in every night no matter how short your journey was, just do it.