lsb777
Established Member
I don't have scientific proof but can only provide an opinion based on recent experience. Mid-February I drove from Brighton area to Liverpool. I left home at 4am and ensured that the home charging finished at that time. I also set the battery pre-heating to come on and also finish at 4am (I think I set it for 90 mins). I didn't set the cabin pre-heating as weather was not icy and I'm happy with the heated seat & s/wheel initially, but did have the HVAC running at fan speed 1 and 23c once I got going. I arrived at Tesla Banbury with 33% battery, so approx 3.29mls/kWh for 135 miles at mostly motorway speed. Based on this alone, it would seem that the pre-heating did help to ensure I started with a warmer battery giving better range than ABRP expected.
There is some logic to using the function in that we all know that EV batteries dislike the cold weather (so a pre-warmed battery should perform better) and batteries do not take rapid charging as effectively when the battery is not at optimum temperature (hence companies like Tesla pre-conditioning their batteries prior to supercharging). Somewhere on the net there's bound to be an experiment to see how much battery is lost by pre-conditioning the battery in the miles before rapid charging, compared to how much longer you may have to wait at the rapid charger and not get the speed you were expecting to see.
There is some logic to using the function in that we all know that EV batteries dislike the cold weather (so a pre-warmed battery should perform better) and batteries do not take rapid charging as effectively when the battery is not at optimum temperature (hence companies like Tesla pre-conditioning their batteries prior to supercharging). Somewhere on the net there's bound to be an experiment to see how much battery is lost by pre-conditioning the battery in the miles before rapid charging, compared to how much longer you may have to wait at the rapid charger and not get the speed you were expecting to see.