First, there are good reasons why people will not want Brian's report to be true.
First, MG owners will likely have an inherent bias for their car and won't want to experience any negativity.
Second, the same owners won't want a bad news story to hit the residual value of their car.
Third, no EV advocates (which is generally everyone who owns an EV) will want the alarmist, exaggerated, bullshit news articles which will inevitably come from the story and which we're so sick and tired of.
Fourth, no owner will want to have the possibility of the same thing happening to them in the back of their mind. We need to trust our cars not to kill us.
Agreed
On the other hand, Brian's experience could well be genuine because, well, and speaking as someone who has been a coder for decades in my career, software can contain bugs.
I spent 23 years of my working life writing assembler Z80 code for high speed packaging machines, it did have it's moments for sure but when safety was concerned there was always a backup / independent / override system in place that did not rely on software. I firmly believe that all cars are no exception to this.
I always implemented watchdog hardware in my system designs (I did hardware and software), if the computer crashed for any reason it was rebooted and operational in 1 Millisecond, the user was completely unaware of it rebooting, our only clue generally was in the logs.
And EVs are mobile computers.
Not just EV's, all cars are mobile computers.
Here is one example of a software bug resulting in a spectacularly expensive loss
I always used flowcharts when programming and it's amazing how many bugs were found at this level when adapting existing code to new applications.
So it's not impossible that Brian's report is 100% genuine and if that's the case, the man deserves sympathy for the ordeal he has experienced.
It's very hard to believe some of the things reported.
The police suggesting he throw the key out of the car, that would never work because once the car is active it would dangerous if it stopped due to loss of key connection. I' sure police 'engineers' would know that.
The brakes not working, how can you possibly lose dual circuit hydraulic brakes?
Why did he not put the parking brake on?
If it was doing 15 mph as in some reports why not stay on a large roundabout and keep going round until the battery was flat (this would have been easier for the police to manage) or just drive into something solid.
Why risk calling his wife to try and get other vehicles out of the way, much better to call the police.
And a police inspector no less driving a van for him to crash into?
Why not drive into the back of his wifes car to remove danger to other road users?
So I will invite him personally to expand on his story here in the hope that he will do so and I expect you members to be respectful as per the rules.
Of course, I doubt that he will attend but you never know.
Just out of interest, if you were a juror in a court case with the evidence presented as above, how would you vote? There are three sides to every story, one, the other and the truth.