MG4 51kWh LFP Battery Health

I have read that battery degradation may be more time-related than distance-related, or at least that it's as much time-related as distance-related. So you might as well go out and have fun.
 
I saw this video of them testing how far they could go after reaching 0% SOC in the MG4 SR. And they still did over 20km (12.5mi).



The numbers don't make sense. There is no way thats the 50.8 kW lfp version
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250513_234352.webp
    Screenshot_20250513_234352.webp
    53.2 KB · Views: 14
Maybe at these very hot temperatures? But then they had four pretty chunky guys in the car.
They had a consumption of 14.2kWh/100km.

It they had the LFP version, it would be 50.8 divided by 14.2 and it would give them a range of 357km.

Now the consumption of 14.2 seems a bit high for an average speed of 60km/h but that could be because of the chunky guys.
 
Don't forget 60km/hr is the average speed, this includes all times they were stopped. It's not the average of when they were actually driving.
So the average speed could be higher, depending how much time they spent stopped.
 
1000086765.web sayfası
1000049130.web sayfası

My vehicle is a model with a mg4 lfp battery. After approximately 14 months and 46 thousand kilometers, the battery degradation rate is %3.33... what do you think it looks like?
 
I'm sure the LFPs initial degradation at least is mainly time based.

My 51 is about 18 months old. Very infrequently driven, only 6,700km on the clock. Car scanner shows my battery health at about 93%.
 
The numbers don't make sense. There is no way thats the 50.8 kW lfp version
442kms divided by 7.3 hrs comes out to close enough to 60km/h, they deserve a medal for being able to drive an MG4 with 4 big blokes in it at a constant 60km/h, I'd have be in a 7 hr long 50km/h zone to do that o_O

T1 Terry
 
Don't forget 60km/hr is the average speed, this includes all times they were stopped. It's not the average of when they were actually driving.
So the average speed could be higher, depending how much time they spent stop

Don't forget 60km/hr is the average speed, this includes all times they were stopped. It's not the average of when they were actually driving.
So the average speed could be higher, depending how much time they spent stopped.
There are a lot of variables, but as an owner of an mg4 51kw, I am one hundred percent positive that they could not have gone 442 km on one charge.

The 64kw version seems the most possible suspect. Also correct me if I am wrong but I don't think the std version comes with a spoiler. Maybe it does in Thailand.
I'm sure the LFPs initial degradation at least is mainly time based.

My 51 is about 18 months old. Very infrequently driven, only 6,700km on the clock. Car scanner shows my battery health at about 93%.
I would agree, mine is 7500km , bought the 2023 std in July of 2024 with 0 on the clock. Had 96% , now 95%. Once it came off the assembly line and into my hands it lost 4 percent. I wonder at what state of charge it sat for so long to lose that much battery capacity.
 
Thailand do have a Trophy spec MG4 with the 51kWh LFP battery pack. I'm fairly sure someone from Thailand on this forum has one.
Also EVs often have smaller batteries and less powerful motors in Asian countries (as they aren't competing so much with legacy overpowered ICE vehicles). They also are more likely to use LFP. So the equivalent model might have a smaller LFP battery.
 

Are you enjoying your MG4?

  • Yes

    Votes: 955 77.5%
  • I'm in the middle

    Votes: 184 14.9%
  • No

    Votes: 93 7.5%
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MG ZS EV Retrospective & First Look at the MGS5 EV | Live Q&A with Owners & MGEVs Panel
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom