Test drive (MG4 SE long range) impressions

It's not unknown for the early demo cars to be non-standard, in fact they are often claimed not to be to excuse any criticisms of things like harsh ride and poor handling - "not yet in UK road specification" which never gets changed.
Back in the day the demo E-type Jags had wide angle heads from the D-type racing cars and managed an easy 150mph according to the testers. Production cars struggled to get beyond 145mph until the big stick of the V12 was introduced. Mind you they are all frightening with an absence of brakes for the speeds they are capable of.
Not only E-Types. It happened to even the lowly Metro. The eco version had a very long forth gear to give it outstanding fuel economy but the demonstrators were tuned for power so when the public tried them they were surprised that such a fuel efficient car still pulled OK. Of course the demonstrators fuel economy was nowhere near the advertised figures and the customers cars didn't accelerate like the demonstrators.
 
Yeah, my Suzuki Vitara does that when coming out of busy junctions. It’s a front wheel drive car. There was none of that wheel spin in the MG4 and the roads were very wet.
Have you got cheapo, ditch finder tyres on it, esp the front axle?
The amount of people who simply go to a tyre place and go 'yeah, they'll do' with no idea is frighting. Not saying you do that of course, but millions do.
With Michelin Pilot Sport 4, you'd get none, or minimal of that. My NISMO RS would light up the tyres like Bonfire night, and that was on Conti Sport Contact 5, the OEM tyre (which are trash). Don't think it's EVER done it on Pilot Sport 4. NISMO RS has 215hp on a FWD, too.
 
Last edited:
Have you got cheapo, ditch finder tyres on it, esp the front axle?
The amount of people who simply go to a tyre place and go 'yeah, they'll do' with no idea is frighting. Not saying you do that of course, but millions do.
With Michelin Pilot Sport 4, you'd get none, or minimal of that. My NISMO RS would light up the types like Bonfire night, and that was on Conti Sport Contact 5, the OEM tyre (which are trash). Don't think it's EVER done it on Pilot Sport 4. NISMO RS has 215hp on a FWD, too.
I usually just replace the tyres with the ones the car came with, which in this case were ContiEcoContact 5 tyres.
 
I usually just replace the tyres with the ones the car came with, which in this case were ContiEcoContact 5 tyres.
Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if those are the culprit. Eco tyres are made for fuel economy, not really performance orientated. Personally I detest Conti tyres across the board. I've NEVER had an OEM Conti tyre which I couldn't wait to get rid of. I also recall the eco Michelin Primacy's which they stuck on the Toyota GR86. Lasted forever but would spin up going over a fag butt.
With a Vitara's power you shouldn't really be getting wheel spin.
 
Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if those are the culprit. Eco tyres are made for fuel economy, not really performance orientated. Personally I detest Conti tyres across the board. I've NEVER had an OEM Conti tyre which I couldn't wait to get rid of. I also recall the eco Michelin Primacy's which they stuck on the Toyota GR86. Lasted forever but would spin up going over a fag butt.
With a Vitara's power you shouldn't really be getting wheel spin.
Yeah, you wouldn’t think so, but I’m guessing the addition of an extra 53Nm of torque from the electric motor when accelerating causes it. Not always, but if I really put my foot down.
 
With Michelin Pilot Sport 4, you'd get none, or minimal of that. My NISMO RS would light up the tyres like Bonfire night, and that was on Conti Sport Contact 5, the OEM tyre (which are trash). Don't think it's EVER done it on Pilot Sport 4. NISMO RS has 215hp on a FWD, too.

Different cars have different suspension set ups with different compromises, so I wouldn't be surprised if the camber set up for the Nismo is less than the Vitara making the latter have less grip, particularly away from straight ahead.

But OEM tyres are often not the best.
 
Not only E-Types. It happened to even the lowly Metro. The eco version had a very long forth gear to give it outstanding fuel economy but the demonstrators were tuned for power so when the public tried them they were surprised that such a fuel efficient car still pulled OK. Of course the demonstrators fuel economy was nowhere near the advertised figures and the customers cars didn't accelerate like the demonstrators.
Back in the day the Sierra Cosworth was advertised with only 204BHP as it was hard enough to get insurance (not helped by Tony Adams). They all left the factory with at least 220BHP but strangely the demonstrators had nearer to 235BHP.
 
I currently own a Suzuki Vitara mild hybrid 1.4 litre turbo petrol, so this is what my comparisons are based on with the MG4. I enjoy driving the Suzuki and have had no issues with it whatsoever. However, the pricing of the MG4 has made it possible for me to consider buying my first ever electric vehicle. It was this review by Jonny Smith on his Late Break Show YouTube channel which piqued my interest, led me to this forum and the resultant test drive I booked today:

Much appreciation to all the forum members old and new who answered my questions and gave me much to ponder. Needless to say I had 101 questions to ask my dealer and to be fair he answered them all honestly and is aware of the issues that are discussed here. For those interested I booked the test drive at MG Perth Just ask for Graham and he’ll be happy to help!

After a short introduction to the car, it’s handling, regenerative breaking and a bit about the controls I was given the key and a route explained to me which took in a bit of city driving, small and large 3 lane roundabouts, dual carriageway, an A road and a few B roads with some villages. I was out for about forty minutes.

Upon opening the door, my immediate impression was the build quality and solidness of the door compared to my Vitara. Sitting down I adjusted the seat and felt the seats to be as comfy, and even better hugging than my present car. Good visibility out the front and hardly any bonnet to see. The rear view wasn’t quite as open as the Suzuki’s though and I will miss that car’s reversing camera. It was weird not having to turn a key and just twisting the dial into drive mode. The steering felt light and responsive and when I did a three point turn, I was thinking I wouldn’t have negotiated the turn as easily in my Vitara. The turning cycle felt shorter to me.

The car gripped the road reassuringly at all times. It was raining with low cloud, but visibility was fine. Sorry, but I was having too much fun to check on the efficiency of the battery. 😅 I did note that I used 2% of the charge over the course of the test drive. There were no rattles or vibrations and only this strange, tinny sound which I found out was a song on the radio the previous driver had left on at a very low volume. I turned that off and enjoyed the peace even at Motorway speeds.

I must say, I was surprised by the acceleration compared with the Vitara when I merged with the dual carriageway. You catch up very quickly with any cars in front, so I’m going to have to be more careful in allowing more space when overtaking. The Vitara goes from 0 to 60 in just over 8 seconds, but the MG4 felt much faster than that acceleration or maybe I just can’t change gears fast enough.

I toggled the heating, demister and temperature controls on the infotainment screen and found it responsive and easy to use. Much better than the small touch screen on my Suzuki.

So, my closing thoughts are, the MG4 will be a step up for me in terms of materials and build quality, handling, responsiveness, acceleration and just fun to driveness! I’ll just have to get over reaching for the non-existent gear stick and for my left foot having nothing much to do.

As it was raining, I wasn’t (didn’t want to get all wet and muddy) able to look under the demonstrator, but it has done over a thousand miles and no oil leak seen. Neither on their Trophy demonstrator. The few cars which have been sold also have not reported this issue, but of course it’s still early days for some drivers, but fingers crossed 🤞 this doesn’t crop up.

I did take photos of the SE short range in the show room.

Can’t wait to take ownership!
View attachment 12467View attachment 12468

Checking for an oil leak????
 
I currently own a Suzuki Vitara mild hybrid 1.4 litre turbo petrol, so this is what my comparisons are based on with the MG4. I enjoy driving the Suzuki and have had no issues with it whatsoever.
I'm not surprised. Always up there with reliability. My experience with them was similar.
Years ago an old Alto as a run around. No issues during 2 years ownership and I bought it with 32K miles on it and 7 years old. A mark 1 '08 Swift Sport, bought it when 7 years old and 48K miles. No issues in about 3 years ownership, expect for a suspension bush.

Are MG typically seen as a very reliable brand?
 
Last edited:

Are you enjoying your MG4?

  • Yes

    Votes: 538 79.1%
  • I'm in the middle

    Votes: 91 13.4%
  • No

    Votes: 51 7.5%
Support us by becoming a Premium Member

Latest MG EVs video

MG3 Hybrid+ & Cyberster Configurator News + hot topics from the MG EVs forums
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom